Hope Rises for Nigeria as Crude Oil Prices Climb

The international prices of crude oil spiked yesterday, raising hopes in the country that Nigeria could meet its financial obligations to its citizens and fulfil its global commitments in the short term as the Brent sold for $34.42 per barrel With dwindling prices of the country’s major revenue earner in the last few weeks, the federal government had had to realign its 2020 budget in the face of current economic realities which have seen the price fall from close to $60 per barrel to just about $20.

But yesterday, the price of crude oil spiked, gaining as much as 15 per cent in just a few hours, with increasing reports that the members of the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and their allies would be holding a virtual meeting to discuss an end to the price war, mainly between Russia and Saudi Arabia.

Consequently, the oil market, which was already experiencing a glut, saw prices crash to an 18-year low in March as the two countries engaged in a price war after Russia declined to join OPEC in deepening production cuts, prompting Saudi Arabia to lower prices and increase output.

The country’s financial projections for the year were also compounded by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has led to the international buyers of the country’s crude oil cutting down on their purchase and consumption, leaving Nigeria’s crude stranded at sea.

But as the prices began to tumble, the Muhammadu Buhari-led government announced some significant changes to its 2020 budget as measures to contain the effect of the outbreak of coronavirus on the nation’s economy.

It outlined a plan to implement a 50 per cent cut in revenue from privatisation proceeds and a review in crude oil benchmark price down to $30, while crude oil production, but kept daily production at 2.18m barrels per day.

With an initial oil benchmark of $57 per barrel in the 2020 budget, the Federal Executive Council was also forced to approve reductions in capital budget by 20 per cent, and 25 per cent cut in recurrent expenditure.

The federal government also adjusted downwards Customs revenue of N1.5 trillion, in anticipation of a significant reduction in economic activities, cut down capital expenditure by 20 per cent across ministries, departments and agencies and also a 25 per cent cut of all government owned enterprises.

However, the upswing in the price of crude oil which started on Thursday continued yesterday with Brent crude oil, the international benchmark, climbing as much as 15 percent to $34.42 per barrel while West Texas Intermediate crude oil, the U.S. benchmark, gained as much as 12 percent to $28.31.

There were reports that the alliance was willing to cut production, after President Donald Trump indicated in a tweet that he expected Russia and the Saudis to slash production by about 10 million barrels per day.More in Home

A Reuters report indicated that OPEC and its allies could meet as early as Monday to discuss a production cut amid the coronavirus pandemic.

“US West Texas Intermediate crude surged as much as 13 per cent to $28.56 per barrel after gaining 25 percent on Thursday. International benchmark Brent crude jumped 17 per cent to $34.91 per barrel at its yesterday intraday highs, continuing the previous day’s 21% gain” the report said.

It added that the cut could be around 10 per cent of global supply, citing an OPEC source, although with this week’s gains, oil prices are still down roughly 50 per cent year-to-date.

SOURCE: This Day

Nigeria cuts crude selling prices to woo buyers

Nigeria has cut the official selling prices for its crude oil to record lows to clear a glut of unsold April-loading cargoes before releasing the May programme on Monday.

The country has had to grapple with an unprecedented excess of oil triggered by the coronavirus outbreak and a price war between Saudi Arabia and Russia for market share.

The Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation cut its April official selling prices for Bonny Light and Qua Iboe by $5 per barrel to dated Brent minus $3.29 and minus $3.10 per barrel, respectively, Reuters reported on Monday.

Brent crude, the international benchmark, has fallen by over 60 per cent since the start of this year. It stood at $26.44 per barrel as of 7:40pm on Monday.

May loading programmes emerged with key grades seeing an increase over the previous month, Reuters reported on Monday.

Bonny Light and Forcados are both higher and due to load 245,000 barrels per day, Bonga 123,000 bpd and Qua Iboe 215,000 bpd.

There will also be two cargoes each of Usan and Yoho, five cargoes each of Brass River and Agbami, six of Egina and four Amenam, according to the report.

The Group Managing Director of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation, Mallam Mele Kyari, said recently that the country was already struggling to find buyers for its crude oil, saying over 50 cargoes were yet to be sold.

The unsold cargoes represented more than 70 per cent of the country’s total oil exports and puts the country in a very difficult spot, according to S&P Global Platts.

Kyari said Nigeria’s crude cargoes had been stranded due to the higher selling price compared with its fellow OPEC members such as Saudi Arabia and Iraq, which could afford to offer discounts of around $5 to $8 per barrel to buyers.

Source: Punch

Nigerian, Qatari LNG cargos heading for UK LNG terminals

United Kingdom’s liquefied natural gas import terminals on the Milford Haven waterway are set to receive a pair of cargoes over the week.

According to the shipping data by Milford Haven Port Authority, the first of the three cargoes is scheduled to arrive at the Dragon LNG terminal on March 24.

The cargo is being transported onboard the GasLog Seattle LNG carrier capable of transporting 155,000 cubic meters of the chilled fuel. The vessel loaded the cargo at the Nigeria LNG facility on Bonny Island.

The second cargo is set to arrive at the South Hook LNG facility on March 31. The cargo, loaded at the Qatari Ras Laffan LNG complex is being transported by the 263,000-cbm Q-Max carrier, Al Samriya.

Natural gas flows from the South Hook LNG terminal to the UK’s national grid on Tuesday was around 44.13 mcm per day, according to the data from the National Grid.

Source: LNG World News

‘Oil companies not leaving Nigeria in next 30 years’

Sarki Auwalu is the Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Department of Petroleum Resources. In this interview with the Business Editor, CLARA NWACHUKWU and FEMI ADEKOYA, he talks about a wide range of issues bordering on oil licensing, compliance with production quotas, gas-to-power, as well as other regulatory issues.

Covid 19 is a global pandemic ravaging the whole world and impacting heavily on oil-producing countries. How is DPR coping with the challenges of this virus?
I will say this is a pandemic that the whole world is facing. Coronavirus is something that has had a huge impact on the energy balance of the world. Once people cannot move, aircraft cannot fly; once energy demand is low, definitely the industry will go low. So, for DPR, we are very careful as we relate with a lot of international oil companies, international service providers, as people fly from different parts of the world and work in the facilities that we monitor, so we consider it very critical. Right before the number of cases rose to the number it is now, we made sure that hand sanitizers are everywhere in the facilities we monitor and in our offices while taking other precautionary measures. This is because we considered that if this virus gets into our operational areas, we will have to shut dow. If we shut down in this era of low oil prices, it will be double jeopardy.

Even at very low oil price, our cost of production per barrel is still very high and the government has for so long said it would address the situation, but that is not happening yet. What is DPR going to do in this regard?
When you talk about production cost, you talk about the average. We are so blessed that we have oil in every terrain. We have it onshore, nearshore, in swamps, offshore, deep offshore and you know that as we go deeper offshore, the cost of production also rises. Again, we have these great reserves whereby the vaults that trap the crude itself is not in a big pool but in several of such pools that require for more wells to be drilled. When you drill, you need a collection point where you need to have flowlines because of the terrain; so all these contribute to the cost of production per barrel as we speak. When you compare Nigeria with countries like Saudi Arabia where they have onshore mainly and the cost of a barrel is just to punch a well here and sell it over there with shorter pipelines and distances, shallower wells, so the cost is lesser compared to us when you add the aggregate cost. To do this, we deployed technology because there are research and development every day and there are two things – one is that the cost of drilling a well at an average is almost the same everywhere, but it is the terrain that differs. When you work over a well to increase production from that well, definitely there is a cost in that number which is economies of scale, so we encourage improved production and enhanced recovery and also cheaper technology that will enable you to produce at a lower price. For example, when you drill a well and you do conventional completion, it is more expensive when you compare it to a smart completion, so we encourage people to go for that smart completion whereby if you change that well into an injectible well or a producing well, you can make it versatile so that it will lower the price because the natural occurrence of hydrocarbon in all the terrain will not allow us to achieve the expected lower cost the way you will put it on a straight line to see it. What we do is to get an aggregate cost and get the cost element to see how we can use technology to reduce it and that is what we are doing.

But the problem mostly is that those costs are usually padded, operators will tell you that they are taking account of their environment plus inflation, but then, the same scenario plays out in other environments?
In DPR, there is a unit called economic value and bench-marking. We developed a solution like software which would aggregate the cost. By law, every company, every year will come and make presentations to us about their work programme and under this work programme, we take cognizance to ask who spent what, which we use to develop the economic value and benchmarking. For investments that have government interests, we now say that for any approval for field development, we use an archive to see the cost. Right now, we have values and that is why we call it to value and benchmarking. Definitely, you will see people resisting and this is a fact, and that was why there was a time we wanted to see how we can reduce the value by some certain percentages because we have empirical data in the sense that we will not approve the field development plan till we now see the economic value. This is because before now, we do not have empirical data and that is helping a lot greatly.

Sarki Auwalu is the Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Department of Petroleum Resources
But does that ensure that producers declare actual production?
Yes of course, because when it comes to actual production, it is different from field development. These are two different things. When you talk about field development, you talk about the cost of developing a field and how you reduce it and make it optimal and when you talk about the cost of production which implies the cost per barrel. Yes, they declare because the unit cost is a function of the investment you make based on the terrain, number of wells you drill, number of people you employ and the companies have no option but to declare. After all, we charge them royalty based on what they produce.

Despite government promises to jumpstart activities in the industry, apart from ExxonMobil and Total, the rest are probably on holiday. What is happening in terms of new finds, exploration and production activities?
Well, I do not know what ExxonMobil or Total did, but I can tell you that the industry is very active, and why do I say this? At present, the industry is maturing and you know that the last time we did license was around 2007 and people invested, people paid bonuses and developed the fields. Right now, what the industry is doing is to see how they revamp and upgrade the fields. There is no international oil company that does not have de-bottlenecking, upgrading or deeper-drilling. Most of the companies that are involved for example in LNG projects, go to drill deeper so that they can get gas to supply rather than going to spend money to explore in new areas. In 2018 and 2019, Seplat alone invested $4 billion. All the investments that came through a gas are Shell; look at Obi-Obi, it is Agip; Egina, it is Total. So, if you look at each of these companies, there is one thing or the other that they are doing because they come here to present their work programmes and for work programmes, the moment you are not active in any field, not making any investment, what we do is carve the field out and put in the offing, there might not be any find and it is not affecting us alone it is affecting them as well because the volume of the reserve they declare from Nigeria determines their price in the international market as they are in the stock market. So, it is in their best interest also to make the finds. It is also in their best interest to be profitable; profitable in the sense that we explore this and we invest, let us see what we can do so that we increase the line of this project and none of the IOCs is thinking of leaving Nigeria in the next 30 years.

Even though you say a lot of them are involved in a number of activities, the belief out there is that a whole lot of blocks are lying fallow and like you said if there is no investment they will relinquish some after five or ten years, but that does not seem to be happening. The IOCs are reluctant to relinquish and DPR is not enforcing that relinquishment policy.

Not only relinquishment, but it is also in the news that we revoked even some active fields; we revoked 98 licences. We revoked many fields and the essence is that it is not in the interest of the company for them to relinquish. What we rate them with is the rate at which they renew the oil mining lease (OML), and a lot of these IOCs take for example Shell, they renewed over 27 OMLs and for the country, it means that we are getting more money. If you come and you renew your mining lease, you are telling me that you are ready to stay in the country for the next 30 years and all of them are doing that. So, this gives us the confidence to say yes, this is real and they come to us and say we want to renew the OML and they renew. When we issue the renewal, we are confident that they are going to stay for the next 30 years and that is our number one pointer.

Secondly, all the known active dormant fields were identified and we asked why are they dormant. Take for example, for an IOC, if a field that is discovered, the risk reserves is 50 million or 40 million barrels, it will be too marginal for Shell to go because of their overhead cost. For some, if the risk reserve is like 200 million or 250 million, they will now decide to say; look, we reserve the right to farm out so that we can still make money out of this if we get somebody to farm-in, and there are lots of applications for that to show that these IOCs are ready.
The Local Oil Companies (LOCs) that farm-in are active as well. So for me, the way I see the industry is an industry that is maturing. The IOCs do not want to take more of overheads, the dormant fields they allow the government to take and the active fields they tell the government to renew and they pay all the renewal fees. They tell the government that we are in it and here they are renewing their licences to say they are going to work with the government for the next 25 years. Those fields that are not economical enough for them are good enough for them to farm-out. They keep it in view and they want to do that and that is why you see some of these IOCs trying to say they have marginal fields they want to give out, but what they really want to do is to farm-out because they have spent money, time but unfortunately, it is not economical for them because it would affect their profit margins. So they rather value it and let someone else farm-in so that government will still make money as the resource does not belong to them anyway, even though they own the lease. However, they want to farm-out of the lease so that someone else will farm-in, and it is a win-win situation for the parties involved.

Since you raised the issue of farm-in and farm-out, I remember what Shell did some years ago when they sold some of their marginal fields and most of the Nigerian companies that bought those assets paid highly because they believed they were going to be operators of those assets, but unfortunately, NNPC came with NPDC with right of first refusal, and many of them complained, saying they thought they would become operators rather than just being a shareowner. Is that fair?
There is a lot to be done when a company wants to farm-out or farm-in, the Nigerian companies did not do their due diligence very well. I want to buy something and I need to know what I am buying and again, a lot of companies seldom come to DPR for due diligence, but rely on consultants that do not know anything. This is a house that has data for everybody; we have a national data repository and this an authentic data which IOCs rely on, but yes, I am a Nigerian company where Shell has agreed to divest to me, so I will only rely on consultants that Shell recommends to me rather than coming to DPR. I want to know what is the available resource here, who does what and what is the history of this growth? They had the advantage, but they did not do that. Secondly, they did not know the rule of engagement for Joint Venture Partnership, nobody reads; and remember, the stake of Shell is not Shell alone, it is Shell, Agip, Total and the likes, so there are no operating venture partners who are the main owners, and the owner of the venture is NNPC, so they have the right of first refusal. If you have 20 per cent or 30 per cent and you want to go out and the person coming in wants to feel that I am to operate, then there is a big problem and that is why we advise them to do their due diligence. Again, look at it this way; NPDC is the only 100 per cent Nigerian company owned by 200 million people, you, me and everybody, we own NPDC. And going into a time where NPDC is the only Nigerian company, where its production is not up to 10000 barrels is a shame, because every country that produces oil and gas, their national oil gas company is up there, look at Petrobras, look Equinor, all these are national oil companies. NNPC is not an oil company it is a corporation housing many other companies, but NPDC is the truly national E&P company that explores oil and gas, and sells crude for 200 million people, so that company needs to be very strong and they are in onshore and offshore. 

If somebody will come, NNPC owns 60 per cent and they have an E&P company, to allow an incoming person who does not have the experience of NPDC, it does not make sense for Nigeria to allow that to happen, and today, NPDC is producing over 200,000 barrels daily. That will never have happened if NNPC does not exercise its right of refusal. So I see it from a perspective of having to protect the interest of 200 million people as against a limited liability company that borrows money at the international market or from national market to take over a field and operate for a limited number of people rather than operating for 200 million people. This is my view, and I think we should be thinking about how NPDC will be better than Equinor or Petrobras or Petronas. Today, Equinor is all over the world, it is a national company of Norway, Petronas is all over the world and it is a national company of Malaysia, Petrobras is all over the world and it is a national company of Brazil. NPDC is the replica and it is only a few years back it hit over 800,000 barrels which is a shame. A country that exports about 1.7 million to 2 million barrels, the production capacity of the company the entire nation own it. I see it from a nationalistic point of view that we need to empower that national company that will bring more accountability, probity and transparency. If people are aware that this is our company, they will not look at Shell. Look at Amni when they decided to leave, nobody believed that NPDC could run the Okoro field and that was the first time the jinx was broken. Thank God for that management who authorised NPDC to take over, look at it now, NPDC is the cash cow for NNPC and the nation.

source: Guardian

Coronavirus: Fuel scarcity looms as NUPENG hints sit-at-home order from Friday

The Nigeria Union of Petroleum and Natural Gas Workers (NUPENG) has expressed concern over the coronavirus outbreak.By Clever Advertising

The cases of the global pandemic in the country have risen to 44 in Nigeria.

The body said it may order its members and those of affiliates to stay at home from Friday if the well-being of tanker drivers, marketers, suppliers among others was not guaranteed.

This was contained in a statement Tuesday night by National President, Williams Eniredonana Akporeha and General Secretary, Afolabi Olawale.

NUPENG observed that its members were rendering critical services to the nation on a daily basis in these critical times.

It noted that the Petroleum Tanker Drivers (PTD), Petrol Station Workers (PSW), Petroleum Depots Workers, Independent Marketers Employees, Oil and Gas Suppliers (OGS), Surface Tankers Kerosene Peddlers (SUKATEP), Liquefied Petroleum Gas Retailers, (LPGAR) and others were becoming highly vulnerable to coronavirus.

“NUPENG is seriously monitoring the unfolding situation while also putting into account the safety and welfare of these vulnerable and integral segments of our membership, which are of paramount concern to us”, it read.

“In the light of the above, the Union may be forced to direct these workers to stay at home with effect from 00:00hrs on Friday 27th March 2020, this is a very difficult decision but necessary and important with respect to the safety of these set of workers.”

Urging members to remain good ambassadors, law-abiding and disciplined, NUPENG prayed that health experts will find a lasting solution to coronavirus.

It urged stakeholders in the downstream sector of the Nigeria Oil and Gas Industry to obey health and safety measures by the World Health Organization (WHO) and Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) by maintaining social distancing and an excellent personal hygiene.

source: https://dailypost.ng/2020/03/25/coronavirus-fuel-scarcity-looms-as-nupeng-hints-sit-at-home-order-from-friday/

Global Lockdown Crashes Oil Price

Oil prices dropped yesterday as governments’ escalated lockdowns to curb the spread of the global Coronavirus outbreak that has slashed the demand outlook for oil and threatened a global economic contraction. 

Brent crude futures fell $1.09, or 4 percent, to $25.89 a barrel while West Texas Intermediate, WTI, crude futures were down 15 cents, or 0.7 percent, at $22.48 a barrel. 

Oil prices have fallen for four straight weeks and have given up about 60 percent since the start of the year. Prices of everything from coal to copper have also been hit by the crisis, while markets in bonds and stocks enter rarely charted territory. 

The coronavirus, which has infected more than 325,000 and killed over 14,000 worldwide, has disrupted business, travel and daily life. Many oil companies have rushed to cut spending and some producers have already begun putting employees on furlough. 

The market has had to contend with the twin shocks of the demand destruction caused by the coronavirus pandemic and the unexpected oil price war that erupted between producers Russia and Saudi Arabia earlier this month. 

“We believe oil prices will continue to fall into the teens in the short term amid disaster demand destruction, building global stocks and no production limits after April 1,” said Joseph McMonigle, senior energy policy analyst at Hedgeye Potomac Research, in a note. 

Almost a third of Americans are now under orders to stay at home as states took extra measures to stem the rising numbers of cases in the world’s biggest economy, while in New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Adern said all non-essential services and businesses are to be shut down.


source: https://www.independent.ng/global-lockdown-crashes-oil-price/

Reduction in pump price, NECA calls for removal of subsidy

The Nigerian Employers’ Consultative Association (NECA) has charged the Federal Government to use present conditions in the oil industry to completely remove subsidy on petroleum products in Nigeria.

Though commending government on the reduction in price of premium motor spirit (PMS), NECA said government should allow the international price of crude to determine the prices of the products in Nigeria, and the template should be flexible to accommodate changes as they might occur.

NECA’s director-general, Dr. Timothy Olawale, noted that it was a welcome development, with the caveat that as Nigeria operates a monoeconomy hinged on oil,  government should ensure a total eradication of the subsidy regime in whatever form.

Olaleye stated that the price of PMS and other petroleum products could have been much lower if the pricing template had been rigorously followed and applied.

He said, “Government should address the issue of subsidy and ensure its total eradication. Energy consumption subsidy is any policy by government that is aimed at reducing the price of energy consumed by citizens relative to what the price would have been in the absence of such policy.

“The regulated price arguably will reduce the consumer price index (CPI) and make it easy to regulate the level of inflation. Subsidy often leads to increased demand for PMS due to over-use and waste arising from reduced price of the product, creating unnecessary shortage of supply.”

The NECA boss urged government to provide leadership and direction in diversifying the economy: “The nation cannot hinge its destiny on the price of a commodity in which it has no control on the pricing.

“It is time to deliberately create a roadmap for rapid diversifying of the economy away from oil. We need actions; the government needs to create avenues for more economic activities to happen like diversifying the tax revenue of the government beyond oil,” he stated.

The NECA DG warned that the shortfall in oil prices should not be a licence to further mortgage the future of the nation with borrowing as the budget is already struggling under the weight of debt service.

source: https://www.sunnewsonline.com/reduction-in-pump-price-neca-calls-for-removal-of-subsidy/

Of Regulation, Deregulation and Petroleum Products Pricing

With low oil prices in the international market, the Nigerian government has been quick to throw a token of fuel price reduction at Nigerians. But there is nothing salutary about the decision of the government to intervene yet again and determine the price of petroleum products. Nosa James-Igbinadolor reports

For a government making pretensions to running a free market economy, the terse announcement from the Minister of State for Petroleum Resources Timipre Sylva sounded incongruous and antithetical to the spirit of a market-determined economy.

The minister, on 18 March 2020, had verbosely announced, “The drop in crude oil prices has lowered the expected open price of imported petrol below the official pump price of N145 per litre.

“Therefore, Mr President has approved that Nigerians should benefit from the reduction in the price of PMS, which is a direct effect of the crash in global crude oil prices.

“In view of this situation, based on the price modulation template approved in 2015, the federal government is directing the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) to reduce the ex-coastal and ex-depot prices of PMS to reflect current market realities.

“Also, the PPPRA shall subsequently issue a monthly guide to NNPC and marketers on the appropriate pricing regime. The agency is further directed to modulate pricing in accordance with prevailing market dynamics and respond appropriately to any further oil market development.

“It is believed that this measure will have a salutary effect on the economy, provide relief to Nigerians and will provide a framework for sustainable supply of PMS to our country.”

Sylva explained that the drop in crude oil prices had lowered the expected open market price of imported petrol below the official pump price of N145 per litre.More in Home

He added, “Therefore, Mr. President has approved that Nigerians should benefit from the reduction in the price of PMS which is a direct effect of the crash in global crude oil prices. In view of this situation, based on the price modulation template approved in 2015, the federal government is directing the NNPC to reduce the ex-coastal and ex-depot prices of PMS to reflect current market realities. Also, the PPPRA shall subsequently issue a monthly guide to NNPC and marketers on the appropriate pricing regime. The agency is further directed to modulate pricing in accordance with prevailing market dynamics and respond appropriately to any further oil market development.”

There is absolutely nothing salutary about the decision of the government to intervene yet again and determine the price of petroleum products. At a banal level, it depicts a caring government attuned to the socio-economic challenges of its citizens, but on a more perceptive plane, it really shows a conflicted government indecisive in taking fundamental macroeconomic decisions and keen on allowing a failed economic policy to keep holding the nation to ransom.

Official figures from the Petroleum Product Pricing Regulatory Agency (PPRA) show that money spent by the federal government in subsidizing petrol is anticipated to gulp a whopping N750.81 billion in 2020. The responsibility of paying for petrol subsidy has been borne for two years on behalf of the federal government by the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC).

This in itself is a major problem as the NNPC has a huge credibility deficit. The 2019 IMF report said of Nigeria’s oil behemoth, “NNPC is self-reporting and its figures cannot be verified or challenged by other government bodies, complicating the validation of information. There are concerns about the accuracy of revenue statements and room for enhancing the level of disclosure, including on what NNPC ultimately considers as net revenue. As highlighted by NEITI, there is significant scope to improve the regularity of NNPC disclosures.”

Petrol subsidy means the government pays petrol marketers for the difference between the regulated price of imported petrol and the Expected Open Market Price (EOMP), estimated by the PPPRA as an import subsidy. This programme is handled through the Petroleum Subsidy Fund (PSF).

As noted recently by BudgIT, with no strategic framework for the removal of the country’s petrol subsidy programme and a population expected to balloon to 398 million people by 2050, Nigeria risks carrying the financial burden of a subsidy programme that could drown out the development of its other sectors over the next 15 years. The organisation goes on to note that “fuel subsidy” deprives the nation of funds needed for critical socio-economic development. For example, the 10 trillion N consumed by the subsidy regime is sufficient to provide 27,000 megawatts (MW) of solar-powered electricity for stable power supply.

As the World Bank posited in its 2015 Nigeria Economy Report No. 3, fuel subsidy has the capacity of incapacitating the country’s ability to save for the rainy day.

The report had warned: “The $35 billion cost of the fuel subsidy during 2010–2014 was a primary reason why Nigeria was unable to accumulate a fiscal reserve in the excess crude account that could have protected the country from the recent oil price shock. Fuel subsidy obligations are expected to reach 18 percent of all government oil revenues in 2015, and, if the current regulated prices are maintained, this is projected to increase to more than 30 percent by 2018.”

The report further went on to note that “in recent years, numerous audits and reports have identified widespread corruption and fraud in the administration of the fuel subsidy, and official petrol imports have substantially exceeded actual consumption. Attempts by the government to crack down on fraud and delay payment of the subsidy have commonly met with severe fuel shortages in the country that also impose high economic and welfare costs on Nigerians”.

For decades, successive Nigerian governments have battled with the demon of petrol price subsidy, yet failed woefully to exorcise the country of the deadly evil. Even though the country is a major oil producer, it imports 91 percent of its daily petrol needs, leaving local prices exposed to shocks from exchange rate fluctuations. Under the Buhari administration, the local currency has consistently and persistently lost its value from N174 to a dollar in the middle of 2015 to N400 in the black market today.

Fiscal policy has remained expansionary and continues to be shaped by developments in the oil sector, rendering the fiscal situation fragile.

Nigeria has long subsidized fuel for its citizens. The cost of the subsidy is high, and economists and the international financial institutions have argued for many years that it significantly distorts the economy. Since the establishment of civilian government in 1999, consecutive presidents have sought to reduce or eliminate the subsidy. But such efforts have been scaled back or abandoned because of deep popular opposition. On occasion, proposals for curtailing the subsidy has led to strikes and serious riots in urban areas, such as Lagos.

Fuel subsidy is very popular because it is the only means by which most Nigerians benefit from the country’s petroleum. It is this placebo effect in which Nigerians see fuel subsidy as their own form of resource transfer from a government that otherwise provides them little or nothing from the current political economy.

With an estimated 37.2 billion barrels of proven oil reserves, Nigeria is one of the world’s largest oil producers. However, the country’s mineral riches have not resulted in a significant improvement in the quality of life for the majority of Nigeria’s citizens, 52 percent of whom live below the national poverty line. In 2019, Nigeria earned about $50 billion from oil and gas sales, thus, the country does not lack the resources to reach its development goals, rather its resources have been utilized inefficiently.

It is this inefficiency characterized by the behemoth called corruption that has kept petrol subsidy standing strong, unable to be dislodged by forces of reforms and rationality.

Kiran Pandey of the Centre for Science and Environment in India in 2019 said, “Nigeria has spent on average N833 billion (about $2.3 billion) a year to subsidize petroleum imports in the past 12 years. The real amount has skyrocketed nearly 5,000 percent and is projected to be at N1.15 trillion.”

Yet, it is not low-income Nigerians who benefit. Expenditure data as reported by the World Bank showed that the distribution of these subsidies is disproportionately concentrated in the hands of the rich. Richer, households spend a larger amount on fuel products, and, consequently, benefit more than poorer households from any universal subsidy on these products. On average the richest 20 percent receive over six times more in subsidy benefits than the poorest 20 percent.

Fuel subsidy largely favours people in higher-income groups as they own cars, run generators more, use more fuel, live in bigger houses and consume more energy. In contrast, the poor often residing in the rural parts of Nigeria, tend to use more charcoal, kerosene, firewood, use less transportation, live in their own small homes, source food from their immediate local and farms. Varied reports by the National Bureau of Statistics on household expenditure supports this view.

Nigeria’s fuel subsidy continues to crowd out other development spending. As reported by Bloomberg, Nigeria spends four times more money subsiding fuel than building new schools, health centre and equipping new science labs. Nigeria’s total allocation for education is about $1.974 billion and it is not much higher for health care. Infant mortality in Nigeria remains unacceptably high at 90.4 per 1,000 live births.

In 2016, it was estimated that only 15 percent of the country’s roads were paved. The $8 billion from the fuel subsidy could help to address some of these issues. This is a no-brainer and certainly neither justifiable nor sustainable.

No doubt, the fall in oil prices occasioned by the coronavirus pandemic and the Russia-Saudi ‘oil war’ provides the government with a veritable platform to destroy the subsidy demon once and for all. The problem, however, is that the government and its agents will likely not take advantage of it to do right to the Nigerian economy and people. The reason is simple; over the years, monies paid as subsidies have become sources of immense wealth to a few who lurk within the corridors of power. Successive Nigerian governments have neither displayed the commitment nor the urgency to effectively end the scourge of fuel subsidy.

The Nigeria Economic Society (NES) Policy brief aptly noted, “Economically-efficient and environmentally-responsive fuel pricing policy has been confronted by two key challenges. In many of the oil-exporting countries, few policy issues pitch good economics against good politics as fuel subsidy.

“First, the entitlement syndrome linked to citizens’ expectation of a share of the oil cake in an economy richly endowed with oil resources and secondly, the political difficulty associated with reconciling the heterogeneity of interests of key stakeholders in the sub-sector. The difficulty facing the elimination of the subsidy trap derives from a coalition of interests that are against efficiency-oriented reform of the sub-sector. They include the powerful petroleum industry labour unions and those who benefit from fuel subsidy payments.”

source: https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/category/editorial/

CBN stops dollar sales to NNPC

CENTRAL Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has stopped local and international oil companies from selling dollars to the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC).

The apex bank said the move is in line with the its determination to improve foreign exchange supply to the economy as the impact of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic bites harder on the economy. The country’s foreign exchange earnings have been depleted.

CBN Governor Godwin Emefiele said the new dollar remittance policy will boost local dollar collections.

Breaking the news during an emergency meeting with bank chief executive officers in Lagos at the weekend, Emefiele spoke of the urgent need to improve dollar supply to the apex bank, which has vowed to meet all dollar obligations to correspondent banks from importers.

CBN’s commitment to naira stability is accompanied with new policies and bottlenecks meant to reduce dollar spending and meet critical obligations, including those to correspondent banks on Letters of Credit and other trade obligations.

The dollar is expected to be sold to the CBN at N377 to the dollar; same rate banks are to auction dollars to the regulator.

The CBN will also be granting naira and forex funding to key local pharmaceutical companies for procurement of raw materials and equipment required to increase local drug production in the country.

They are Emzor, Fidson, GSK, May & Baker, Unique Pharma, Swiss    Pharma, Neimeth, Sagar, Orange Drugs, Dana Pharma, among others, hence the need to effectively harness Nigeria’s dollar earnings in the interest of the economy.

Emefiele explained that the primary focus of the bank at this time is preserving confidence, financial stability and support for the economy.

He said: “We are committed to improving forex supply to the CBN, by directing all oil companies -international, and domestic, whether you are in the service industry, or producing, upstream, mid-stream, downstream, or related companies, to sell their foreign exchange to the CBN and no longer to NNPC, for purposes of funding even import of petroleum products, and also new policy on price modulation.”

The CBN had on Friday officially devalued the naira to N380 to a dollar.  The devaluation came after over three years of push from financial market managers, the World Bank and International Monetary Fund for the local currency to be devalued.

Aside devaluing the naira, the CBN also adopted a unified exchange rate, and pushed the official rate of the naira to N376 to dollar for International Money Transfer Operators rate to banks; N377 to dollar for banks’ dollar sale to CBN and pegged CBN’s dollar sales to banks at N378 and limited dollar sales to Bureaux de Change (BDCs) to $20,000 per week.

Emefiele also advised Nigerians to begin prioritising their import needs, and focus more on sourcing raw materials and inputs locally.

Emefiele said: “In deed, there is no choice than to source raw materials locally. From the information available to us, the various lockdowns in different parts of the world, all counties are locking their borders, and making it difficult for even raw materials and inputs to leave their borders.

“So, it means we have no other choice than to look inwards, especially now we can say that those inputs and raw materials can be sourced locally.”

The CBN, in February, introduced new domiciliary account rules in which it directed that customers can deposit dollar into their domiciliary accounts but are not allowed to transfer it to another party.

Also, only electronic fund transfers into domiciliary accounts can be transferred from such accounts to third parties while cash deposits into such accounts can only be withdrawn in cash.

Another policy encourages foreign portfolio investors to invest in high yielding Open Market Operation (OMO) bills at 14 per cent while local investors are restricted.  Foreign holdings of OMO bills (CBN’s investment instrument to control liquidity) account for over $5 billion of the $37.3 billion foreign reserves.

Besides, it restricted importers of milk from accessing foreign exchange from official market. It limited the importation of milk and other dairy products to six firms- FrieslandCampina WAMCO Nigeria; Chi Limited; TG Arla Dairy Products Limited; Promasidor Nigeria Limited; Nestle Nigeria PLC (MSK only), and Integrated Dairies Limited.

According to the policy guideline, all Forms ‘M’ for the importation of milk and its derivatives will only be allowed for the aforementioned companies.

Analysts, insist that these, with the new policy on dollar collections, will help the apex bank harmonise Nigeria’s foreign exchange earnings and meet local and international obligations.

source: https://thenationonlineng.net/cbn-stops-dollar-sales-to-nnpc/

Workers’ Salaries In Jeopardy As Oil Price Tumbles Again

•FAAC meeting deadlocked as states reject amount presented for sharing

AS another economic recession looms in the wake of the global Covid-19 pandemic, there are very present fears among workers of the 36 state governments over the ability of their governments to continue to pay their salaries.

On Friday, Brent crude futures fell $1.49 or 5.2%, to settle at $26.98 a barrel. United States crude futures for April fell $2.69, or 10.7%, to settle at $22.53 a barrel, whereas Nigeria’s 2019 budget benchmark for crude oil was $57 per barrel.

Group Managing Director of Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), on Wednesday charged Nigerians to prepare for more economic trouble in view of the current multi-year low level of crude price in the international market.

Already, tension has started brewing within the Federation Accounts Allocation Committee (FAAC) whose members could not agree on Wednesday over the amount presented for sharing.

An official in the ministry hinted that members of the committee could not agree on the amount presented for sharing by the revenue generating agencies.

The amount presented for sharing was far below what the members of the committee were expecting to be shared by the three tiers of government.

And since the committee could not agree on the amount to be shared, the issue would have to be taken to the National Economic Council meeting scheduled to hold on Thursday.

With the oil price now more than 50 per cent lower than Nigeria’s budget benchmark, the country’s oil-dependent economy has come under more pressure.

The fresh crisis is coming even while workers in the states are beginning to heave a sigh of relief after the economic recession of 2016 which threw workers of most states into economic misery.

At a point, 27 states were owing workers and pensioners salaries and entitlements ranging from one to 36 months.

A 2017 survey showed that many states defaulted in the payments of pensions and gratuities, with Imo, Taraba and Niger states owing pensioners two to three years in entitlements.

Kogi, Abia, Benue, Oyo, Ekiti and Ondo states had not paid their workers’ salaries in 2017, owing at least four months’ salary. Lagos and Rivers, however, did not owe any salary arrears.

It is likely that the current crisis will hit states and their workers harder than it happened in 2016 because the lowest price then was $29 per barrel and it quickly moved up to $35 per barrel and continued climbing.

But now, however, experts are predicting that oil price could fall to as low as $10 per barrel with the rampaging c oronavirus and oil war between Saudi Arabia and Russia.

Now again, minimum wage in the country has been raised from the then N18, 000 to N30, 000.

Aside funds from federation accounts, the only other source of income for the states is their internally generated revenue (IGR), which was still paltry for most states and is unable to meet their recurrent needs.

In the nine months to September 2019, the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) reported the 36 states and FCT to have generated N986.29bn as their IGR.

Seven states recorded growth in IGR while 30 states and the FCT recorded decline in IGR at the end of Q3 2019. Lagos state has the highest Internally Generated Revenue with N297.09bn recorded, closely followed by Rivers with N107.03bn while Yobe State recorded the least Internally Generated revenue.

Aside their paltry IGR, states were still groaning under the yoke of the repayments of massive bailout given them by the Federal Government during the 2016 recession.

A total of N614 billion was issued out to 35 states except Lagos during the recession under the National Budget Support Loan Facility.

Federal Government in 2019, demanded the repayment of the sum.

Source